Paper detail

Experimental evidence of the failure of Jarzynski equality in active baths

Most natural and engineered processes, such as biomolecular reactions, protein folding, and population dynamics, occur far from equilibrium and, therefore, cannot be treated within the framework of classical equilibrium thermodynamics. The Jarzynski equality holds the promise to calculate the free-energy difference between two states from the Boltzmann-weighted statistics of the irreversible work done along trajectories arbitrarily out of equilibrium. This equality is the subject of intense activity. However, the applicability of the Jarzynski equality to systems far from equilibrium such as living matter has not been investigated yet. We present an experimental test of the Jarzynski equality predictions on a paradigmatic physical model, i.e. a Brownian particle held in an optical potential, coupled either to a thermal bath or to an active bath. While in the thermal bath we find that the Jarzynski equality correctly retrieves the free-energy difference from nonequilibrium measurements, in the active bath the Jarzynski equality fails because of the presence of non-Boltzmann statistics. We corroborate our experimental findings with theoretical arguments and numerical simulations.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.