Paper detail

Experimental Data for Goldfeld's Conjecture over Function Fields

This paper presents empirical evidence supporting Goldfeld's conjecture on the average analytic rank of a family of quadratic twists of a fixed elliptic curve in the function field setting. In particular, we consider representatives of the four classes of non-isogenous elliptic curves over F_q(t) with (q,6)=1 possessing two places of multiplicative reduction and one place of additive reduction. The case of q=5 provides the largest data set as well as the most convincing evidence that the average analytic rank converges to 1/2, which we also show is a lower bound following an argument of Kowalski. The data was generated via explicit computation of the L-function of these elliptic curves, and we present the key results necessary to implement an algorithm to efficiently compute the L-function of non-isotrivial elliptic curves over F_q(t) by realizing such a curve as a quadratic twist of a pullback of a `versal' elliptic curve. We also provide a reference for our open-source library ELLFF, which provides all the necessary functionality to compute such L-functions, and additional data on analytic rank distributions as they pertain to the density conjecture.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.