Paper detail

Experimental consequences of no-scale supergravity in light of the CDF $eeγγ$ event

We explore two possible interpretations for the CDF $eeγγ+E_T\hskip-13pt/\quad$ event in the context of a recently proposed one-parameter no-scale supergravity model with a light gravitino. We delineate the region in parameter space consistent with the kinematics of the event interpreted either as selectron pair-production ($p\bar p\to\tilde e^+\tilde e^-\,X$, $\tilde e=\tilde e_R,\tilde e_L$) or as chargino pair-production ($p\bar p\toχ^+_1χ^-_1\,X$). In the context of this model, the selectron interpretation requires $\tilde e=\tilde e_R$ and predicts comparable rates for $\ell^\pmγγ+E_T\hskip-13pt/\quad$, whereas the chargino interpretation predicts comparable rates for $(\ell^\pm\ell^{'+}\ell^{'-},\ell^+\ell^-,\ell^+\ell^-jj)\,γγ+E_T\hskip-13pt/\quad$. We also consider the constraints from LEP~1.5 and the expectations for LEP~2. We point out that one of the acoplanar photon pairs observed by the OPAL collaboration at LEP~1.5 may be attributable to supersymmetry in the present model via $e^+e^-\toχ^0_1χ^0_1\to γγ+E_T\hskip-13pt/\quad$. We also show how similar future events at LEP~2 may be used to deduce the neutralino mass.

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.