Paper detail

Expected complexity analysis of stochastic direct-search

This work presents the convergence rate analysis of stochastic variants of the broad class of direct-search methods of directional type. It introduces an algorithm designed to optimize differentiable objective functions $f$ whose values can only be computed through a stochastically noisy blackbox. The proposed stochastic directional direct-search (SDDS) algorithm accepts new iterates by imposing a sufficient decrease condition on so called probabilistic estimates of the corresponding unavailable objective function values. The accuracy of such estimates is required to hold with a sufficiently large but fixed probability $β$. The analysis of this method utilizes an existing supermartingale-based framework proposed for the convergence rates analysis of stochastic optimization methods that use adaptive step sizes. It aims to show that the expected number of iterations required to drive the norm of the gradient of $f$ below a given threshold $ε$ is bounded in $\mathcal{O}\left(ε^{\frac{-p}{\min(p-1,1)}}/(2β-1)\right)$ with $p>1$. Unlike prior analysis using the same aforementioned framework such as those of stochastic trust-region methods and stochastic line search methods, SDDS does not use any gradient information to find descent directions. However, its convergence rate is similar to those of both latter methods with a dependence on $ε$ that also matches that of the broad class of deterministic directional direct-search methods which accept new iterates by imposing a sufficient decrease condition.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.