Paper detail

Exotic Quantum Difference Equations and Integral Solutions

One of the fundamental objects in the $K$-theoretic enumerative geometry of Nakajima quiver varieties is known as the the capping operator. It is uniquely determined as the fundamental solution to a system of $q$-difference equations. Such difference equations involve shifts of two sets of variables, the variables arising as equivariant parameters for a torus that acts on the variety and an additional set of variables known as Kähler parameters. The difference equations in the former variables were identified with the qKZ equations in [28]. The difference equations in the latter variables were identified representation theoretically in [30] using an analog of the quantum dynamical Weyl group. Once this representation theoretic description is known, there is an obvious generalization of these equations, which we refer to as exotic quantum difference equations. They depend on a choice of alcove in a certain hyperplane arrangement in $\mathrm{Pic}(X)\otimes \mathbb{R}$, with the usual difference equations corresponding to the alcove containing small anti-ample line bundles. As our main result, we relate the fundamental solution of these equations back to quasimap counts using the so-called vertex with descendants, with descendants given in terms of $K$-theoretic stable envelopes. In the case of the Hilbert scheme of points in $\mathbb{C}^2$, we write our exotic quantum difference equations using the quantum toroidal algebra. We use the results of [6] to obtain formulas for the $K$-theoretic stable envelopes of arbitrary slope. Using this, we are able to write explicit formulas for the solutions of the exotic difference equations. These formulas can be written as contour integrals. As a partially conjectural application of our results, we apply the saddlepoint approximation to these integrals to diagonalize the Bethe subalgebras of the quantum toroidal algebra for arbitrary slope.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.