Paper detail

Existence of strong solutions to the steady Navier-Stokes equations for a compressible heat-conductive fluid with large forces

We prove that there exists a strong solution to the Dirichlet boundary value problem for the steady Navier-Stokes equations of a compressible heat-conductive fluid with large external forces in a bounded domain $R^d (d = 2, 3)$, provided that the Mach number is appropriately small. At the same time, the low Mach number limit is rigorously verified. The basic idea in the proof is to split the equations into two parts, one of which is similar to the steady incompressible Navier-Stokes equations with large forces, while another part corresponds to the steady compressible heat-conductive Navier-Stokes equations with small forces. The existence is then established by dealing with these two parts separately, establishing uniform in the Mach number a priori estimates and exploiting the known results on the steady incompressible Navier-Stokes equations.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.