Paper detail

Existence of stationary weak solutions for the heat conducting flows

The steady compressible Navier--Stokes--Fourier system is considered, with either Dirichlet or Navier boundary conditions for the velocity and the heat flux on the boundary proportional to the difference of the temperature inside and outside. In dependence on several parameters, i.e. the adiabatic constant $γ$ appearing in the pressure law $p(\vr,\vt) \sim \vr^γ+ \vr \vt$ and the growth exponent in the heat conductivity, i.e. $κ(\vt) \sim (1+ \vt^m)$, and without any restriction on the size of the data, the main ideas of the construction of weak and variational entropy solutions for the three-dimensional flows with temperature dependent viscosity coefficients are explained. Further, the case when it is possible to prove existence of solutions with bounded density is reviewed. The main changes in the construction of solutions for the two-dimensional flows are mentioned and finally, results for more complex systems are reviewed, where the steady compressible Navier--Stokes--Fourier equations play an important role.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.