Paper detail

Existence of normalized ground state solution to a mixed Schrödinger system in a plane

In this paper, we establish the existence of positive ground state solutions for a class of mixed Schrödinger systems with concave-convex nonlinearities in $\mathbb{R}^2$, subject to $L^2$-norm constraints; that is, \[ \left\{ \begin{aligned} -\partial_{xx} u + (-Δ)_y^s u + λ_1 u &= μ_1 u^{p-1} + βr_1 u^{r_1-1} v^{r_2}, && -\partial_{xx} v + (-Δ)_y^s v + λ_2 v &= μ_2 v^{q-1} + βr_2 u^{r_1} v^{r_2-1}, && \end{aligned} \right. \] subject to the $L^2$-norm constraints: \[ \int_{\mathbb{R}^2} u^2 \,\mathrm{d}x\mathrm{d}y = a \quad \text{and} \quad \int_{\mathbb{R}^2} v^2 \,\mathrm{d}x\mathrm{d}y = b, \] where $(x,y)\in \mathbb{R}^2$, $u, v \geq 0$, $s \in \left(1/2, 1 \right)$, $μ_1, μ_2, β> 0$, $r_1, r_2 > 1$, the prescribed masses $a, b > 0$, and the parameters $λ_1, λ_2$ appear as Lagrange multipliers. Moreover, the exponents $p, q, r_1 + r_2$ satisfy: \[ \frac{2(1+3s)}{1+s} < p, q, r_1 + r_2 < 2_s, \] where $2_s = \frac{2(1+s)}{1-s}$. To obtain our main existence results, we employ variational techniques such as the Mountain Pass Theorem, the Pohozaev manifold, Steiner rearrangement, and others, consolidating the works of Louis Jeanjean et al. \cite{jeanjean2024normalized}.

preprint2024arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.