Paper detail

Existence of k-ary Trees: Subtree Sizes, Heights and Depths

The rooted tree is an important data structure, and the subtree size, height, and depth are naturally defined attributes of every node. We consider the problem of the existence of a k-ary tree given a list of attribute sequences. We give polynomial time (O(nlog(n))) algorithms for the existence of a k-ary tree given depth and/or height sequences. Our most significant results are the Strong NP-Completeness of the decision problems of existence of k-ary trees given subtree sizes sequences. We prove this by multi-stage reductions from NUMERICAL MATCHING WITH TARGET SUMS. In the process, we also prove a generalized version of the 3-PARTITION problem to be Strongly NP-Complete. By looking at problems where a combination of attribute sequences are given, we are able to draw the boundary between easy and hard problems related to existence of trees given attribute sequences and enhance our understanding of where the difficulty lies in such problems.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.