Paper detail

Exending pseudo-arcs in odd characteristic

A {\em pseudo-arc} in $\mathrm{PG}(3n-1,q)$ is a set of $(n-1)$-spaces such that any three of them span the whole space. A pseudo-arc of size $q^n+1$ is a {\em pseudo-oval}. If a pseudo-oval $\mathcal{O}$ is obtained by applying field reduction to a conic in $\mathrm{PG}(2,q^n)$, then $\mathcal{O}$ is called a {\em pseudo-conic}. We first explain the connection of (pseudo-)arcs with Laguerre planes, orthogonal arrays and generalised quadrangles. In particular, we prove that the Ahrens-Szekeres GQ is obtained from a $q$-arc in $\mathrm{PG}(2,q)$ and we extend this construction to that of a GQ of order $(q^n-1,q^n+1)$ from a pseudo-arc of $\mathrm{PG}(3n-1,q)$ of size $q^n$. The main theorem of this paper shows that if $\mathcal{K}$ is a pseudo-arc in $\mathrm{PG}(3n-1,q)$, $q$ odd, of size larger than the size of the second largest complete arc in $\mathrm{PG}(2,q^n)$, where for one element $K_i$ of $\mathcal{K}$, the partial spread $\mathcal{S}=\{K_1,\ldots,K_{i-1},K_{i+1},\ldots,K_{s}\}/K_i$ extends to a Desarguesian spread of $\mathrm{PG}(2n-1,q)$, then $\mathcal{K}$ is contained in a pseudo-conic. The main result of \cite{Casse} also follows from this theorem.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.