Paper detail

Excursion Probability of Certain Non-centered Smooth Gaussian Random Fields

Let $X = \{X(t): t\in T \}$ be a non-centered, unit-variance, smooth Gaussian random field indexed on some parameter space $T$, and let $A_u(X,T) = \{t\in T: X(t)\geq u\}$ be the excursion set of $X$ exceeding level $u$. Under certain smoothness and regularity conditions, it is shown that, as $u\to \infty$, the excursion probability $\mathbb{P}\{\sup_{t\in T} X(t)\ge u \}$ can be approximated by the expected Euler characteristic of $A_u(X,T)$, denoted by $\mathbb{E}\{χ(A_u(X,T))\}$, such that the error is super-exponentially small. This verifies the expected Euler characteristic heuristic for a large class of non-centered smooth Gaussian random fields and provides a much more accurate approximation compared with those existing results by the double sum method. The explicit formulae for $\mathbb{E}\{χ(A_u(X,T))\}$ are also derived for two cases: (i) $T$ is a rectangle and $X-\mathbb{E} X$ is stationary; (ii) $T$ is an $N$-dimensional sphere and $X-\mathbb{E} X$ is isotropic.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.