Paper detail

Exclusive $D_s$ semileptonic branching fraction measurements

We measure absolute branching fractions for six exclusive $D_s$ semileptonic decays. We use data collected in the CLEO-c detector from $e^+e^-$ annihilations delivered by the Cornell Electron Storage Ring with a center-of-mass energy near 4170 MeV. We find $\mathcal{B}(D_s \to ϕe ν)~= (2.14 \pm 0.17 \pm 0.09)$%, $\mathcal{B}(D_s \to ηe ν)~= (2.28 \pm 0.14 \pm 0.20)$%, and $\mathcal{B}(D_s \to η' e ν)~= (0.68 \pm 0.15 \pm 0.06)$% for the largest modes, where the first uncertainties are statistical and the second are systematic. We also obtain $\mathcal{B}(D_s \to K^0 e ν)~= (0.39 \pm 0.08 \pm 0.03)$%, $\mathcal{B}(D_s \to K^* e ν)~= (0.18 \pm 0.04 \pm 0.01)$%, and $\mathcal{B}(D_s \to f_0 e ν, f_0 \to ππ)~= (0.13 \pm 0.02 \pm 0.01)$% for $f_0$ masses within 60 MeV of 980 MeV. We use our results to determine the $η-η'$ and $f_0$ mixing angles with $s\bar{s}$, and we combine our results with lattice calculations to estimate $|V_{cs}|$. This measurement improves upon the $D_s$ semileptonic branching ratio precision and provides a new approach for future work that eliminates the $D_s^*$ daughter photon reconstruction.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.