Paper detail

Excluded vertex-minors for graphs of linear rank-width at most k

Linear rank-width is a graph width parameter, which is a variation of rank-width by restricting its tree to a caterpillar. As a corollary of known theorems, for each $k$, there is a finite obstruction set $\mathcal{O}_k$ of graphs such that a graph $G$ has linear rank-width at most $k$ if and only if no vertex-minor of $G$ is isomorphic to a graph in $\mathcal{O}_k$. However, no attempts have been made to bound the number of graphs in $\mathcal{O}_k$ for $k\ge 2$. We show that for each $k$, there are at least $2^{Ω(3^k)}$ pairwise locally non-equivalent graphs in $\mathcal{O}_k$, and therefore the number of graphs in $\mathcal{O}_k$ is at least double exponential. To prove this theorem, it is necessary to characterize when two graphs in $\mathcal O_k$ are locally equivalent. A graph is a block graph if all of its blocks are complete graphs. We prove that if two block graphs without simplicial vertices of degree at least $2$ are locally equivalent, then they are isomorphic. This not only is useful for our theorem but also implies a theorem of Bouchet [Transforming trees by successive local complementations, J. Graph Theory 12 (1988), no. 2, 195-207] stating that if two trees are locally equivalent, then they are isomorphic.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.