Paper detail

Excitation and Ionization Properties of Star-forming Galaxies at z=2.0-9.3 with JWST/NIRSpec

We utilize medium-resolution JWST/NIRSpec observations of 164 galaxies at $z=2.0-9.3$ from the Cosmic Evolution Early Release Science (CEERS) survey to investigate the evolution of the excitation and ionization properties of galaxies at high redshifts. Our results represent the first statistical constraints on the evolution of the [OIII]/H$β$ vs. [NII]/H$α$, [SII]/H$α$, and [OI]/H$α$ ``BPT'' diagrams at $z>2.7$, and the first analysis of the O32 vs. R23 diagram at $z>4$ with a large sample. We divide the sample into five redshift bins containing 30-40 galaxies each. The subsamples at $z\sim2.3$, $z\sim3.3$, and $z\sim4.5$ are representative of the main-sequence star-forming galaxy population at these redshifts, while the $z\sim5.6$ and $z\sim7.5$ samples are likely biased toward high specific star-formation rate due to selection effects. Using composite spectra, we find that each subsample at $z=2.0-6.5$ falls on the same excitation sequence in the [NII] and [SII] BPT diagrams and the O32-R23 diagram on average, offset from the sequences followed by $z=0$ HII regions in the same diagrams. The direction of these offsets are consistent with high-redshift star-forming galaxies uniformly having harder ionizing spectra than typical local galaxies at fixed nebular metallicity. The similarity of the average line ratios suggests that the ionization conditions of the interstellar medium do not strongly evolve between $z\sim2$ and $z\sim6$. Overall, the rest-optical line ratios suggest the $z=2.7-9.3$ CEERS/NIRSpec galaxies at log($M_*/M_{\odot})\sim7.5-10$ have high degrees of ionization and moderately low oxygen abundances ($\sim0.1-0.3~Z_{\odot}$), but are not extremely metal poor ($<0.1~Z_{\odot}$) even at $z>6.5$.

preprint2023arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.