Paper detail

Excitation and charge transfer in hydrogen-proton collisions at 5--80 keV and application to astrophysical shocks

In astrophysical regimes where the collisional excitation of hydrogen atoms is relevant, the cross sections for the interactions of hydrogen atoms with electrons and protons are necessary for calculating line profiles and intensities. In particular, at relative velocities exceeding ~1000 km/s, collisional excitation by protons dominates over that by electrons. Surprisingly, the hydrogen-proton cross sections at these velocities do not exist for atomic levels of n >= 4, forcing researchers to utilize extrapolation via inaccurate scaling laws. In this study, we present a faster and improved algorithm for computing cross sections for the hydrogen-proton collisional system, including excitation and charge transfer to the n >= 2 levels of the hydrogen atom. We develop a code named BDSCx which directly solves the Schrodinger equation with variable (but non-adaptive) resolution and utilizes a hybrid spatial-Fourier grid. Our novel hybrid grid reduces the number of grid points needed from ~4000 n^6 (for a "brute force", Cartesian grid) to ~2000 n^4 and speeds up the computation by a factor ~50 for calculations going up to n = 4 . We present (l,m)-resolved results for charge-transfer and excitation final states for n = 2--4 and for projectile energies of 5--80 keV, as well as fitting functions for the cross sections. The ability to accurately compute proton-hydrogen cross sections to n = 4 allows us to calculate the Balmer decrement, the ratio of Balmer alpha to Balmer beta line intensities. We find that the Balmer decrement starts to increase beyond its largely constant value of 2--3 below 10 keV, reaching values of 4--5 at 5 keV, thus complicating its use as a diagnostic of dust extinction when fast (~1000$ km/s) shocks are impinging upon the ambient interstellar medium.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.