Paper detail

Excitation and abundance study of CO+ in the interstellar medium

Observations of CO+ suggest column densities on the order 10^12 cm^-2 that can not be reproduced by many chemical models. CO+ is more likely to be destroyed than excited in collisions with hydrogen. An anomalous excitation mechanism may thus have to be considered when interpreting CO^+ observations. Chemical models are used to perform a parameter study of CO^+ abundances. Line fluxes are calculated for N(CO+)=10^12 cm^-2 and different gas densities and temperatures using a non-LTE escape probability method. The chemical formation and destruction rates are considered explicitly in the detailed balance equations of the radiative transfer. In addition, the rotational levels of CO+ are assumed to be excited upon chemical formation according to a formation temperature. It is found, that chemical models are generally able to produce high fractional CO+ abundances (x(CO+) =10^-10). In a far-ultraviolet (FUV) dominated environment, however, high abundances of CO+ are only produced in regions with a Habing field G0 > 100 and T(kin) > 600 K, posing a strong constraint on the gas temperature. For gas densities >10^6 cm^-3 and temperatures > 600 K, the combination of chemical and radiative transfer analysis shows little effect on intensities of CO+ lines with upper levels N_up <= 3. Significantly different line fluxes are calculated with an anomalous excitation mechanism, however, for transitions with higher upper levels and densities >10^6 cm ^ -3. The Herschel Space Observatory is able to reveal such effects in the terahertz wavelength regime. Ideal objects to observe are protoplanetary disks with densities 10^6 cm^-3. It is finally suggested that the CO+ chemistry may be well understood and that the abundances observed so far can be explained with a high enough gas temperature and a proper geometry.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.