Paper detail

Exchange Parameters in the TCNE-based Magnets as Estimated with use of the Effective Hamiltonian Crystal Field Method

Estimates of the exchange interaction parameter (J) between electronic magnetic momenta residing in the d-shells of several divalent first row transition metal ions, and those residing on the [TCNE]$^-$. anion-radicals (TCNE = tetracyanoethylene) that are bonded to the metal ion are obtained by the use of the EHCF method in the cluster approximation. The clusters geometry was set according to that observed for Mn$^{II}$(TCNE)$_{1/2}$(I$_3$)$_{1/2}$ and M$^{II}$(TCNE)(C$_4$(CN)$_8$)$_{1/2}$ (M = Fe, Mn) with the [TCNE]$^{-.}$. For the Mn$^{II}$(TCNE)$_{1/2}$(I$_3$)$_{1/2}$ two cluster types are considered: one with the geometry corresponding to [TCNE]$^{-.}$ in the two-dimensional layer, and another connecting the layers. For M$^{II}$(TCNE)(C$_4$(CN)$_8$)$_{1/2}$ only the layer position of the [TCNE]$^{-.}$ is considered. In all cases the LUMO (singly filled in the material) is predominantly concentrated on the ethylenic C-C bond and is antibonding. The J value for the Mn$^{II}$(TCNE)$_{1/2}$(I$_3$)$_{1/2}$ layer is at least as twice as strong as one for the similar geometry for M$^{II}$(TCNE)(C$_4$(CN)$_8$)$_{1/2}$. The correct order of magnitude of the calculated exchange parameters, as compared with those extracted from experimentsindicates the general validity of this approach. However, the direct comparison of these J values with the critical temperatures is not possible since these latter heavily depend on details of the interlayer coupling not available through the EHCF procedure. In order to get more information on the geometry dependence of the exchange parameters, the dependence on the tilt angle of the TCNE with respect to the plane formed by the metal ions and four equatorial NCMe groups was investigated. In all cases, a remarkably strong dependence, having different trends depending on the number of electrons in the d-shells of respective transition metal ions was observed.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.