Paper detail

Excellence, F-singularities, and solidity

An $R$-algebra $S$ is $R$-solid if there exists a nonzero $R$-linear map $S \rightarrow R$. In characteristic $p$, the study of $F$-singularities such as Frobenius splittings implicitly rely on the $R$-solidity of $R^{1/p}$. Following recent results of the first two authors on the Frobenius non-splitting of certain excellent $F$-pure rings, in this paper we use the notion of solidity to systematically study the notion of excellence, with an emphasis on $F$-singularities. We show that for rings $R$ essentially of finite type over complete local rings of characteristic $p$, reducedness implies the $R$-solidity of $R^{1/p}$, $F$-purity implies Frobenius splitting, and $F$-pure regularity implies split $F$-regularity. We demonstrate that Henselizations and completions are not solid, providing obstructions for the $R$-solidity of $R^{1/p}$ for arbitrary excellent rings. This also has negative consequences for the solidity of big Cohen-Macaulay algebras, an important example of which are absolute integral closures of excellent local rings in prime characteristic. We establish a close relationship between the solidity of absolute integral closures and the notion of Japanese rings. Analyzing the Japanese property reveals that Dedekind domains $R$ for which $R^{1/p}$ is $R$-solid are excellent, despite our recent examples of excellent Euclidean domains with no nonzero $p^{-1}$-linear maps. Additionally, we show that while perfect closures are often solid in algebro-geometric situations, there exist locally excellent domains with solid perfect closures whose absolute integral closures are not solid. In an appendix, Karen E. Smith uses the solidity of absolute integral closures to characterize the test ideal for a large class of Gorenstein domains of prime characteristic.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.