Examining the validity of Schatten-pp-norm-based functionals as coherence measures

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Abstract

It has been asked by different authors whether the two classes of Schatten-pp-norm-based functionals Cp(ρ)=min⁡σ∈I∣∣ρ−σ∣∣pC_p(ρ)=\min_{σ\in\mathcal{I}}||ρ-σ||_p and C~p(ρ)=∥ρ−Δρ∥p \tilde{C}_p(ρ)= \|ρ-Δρ\|_{p} with p≥1p\geq 1 are valid coherence measures under incoherent operations, strictly incoherent operations, and genuinely incoherent operations, respectively, where I\mathcal{I} is the set of incoherent states and ΔρΔρ is the diagonal part of density operator ρρ. Of these questions, all we know is that Cp(ρ)C_p(ρ) is not a valid coherence measure under incoherent operations and strictly incoherent operations, but all other aspects remain open. In this paper, we prove that (1) C~1(ρ)\tilde{C}_1(ρ) is a valid coherence measure under both strictly incoherent operations and genuinely incoherent operations but not a valid coherence measure under incoherent operations, (2) C1(ρ)C_1(ρ) is not a valid coherence measure even under genuinely incoherent operations, and (3) neither Cp>1(ρ){C}_{p>1}(ρ) nor C~p>1(ρ)\tilde{C}_{p>1}(ρ) is a valid coherence measure under any of the three sets of operations. This paper not only provides a thorough examination on the validity of taking Cp(ρ)C_p(ρ) and C~p(ρ)\tilde{C}_p(ρ) as coherence measures, but also finds an example that fulfills the monotonicity under strictly incoherent operations but violates it under incoherent operations.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.