Paper detail

Examining the secondary product origin of cosmic ray positrons with the latest AMS-02 data

Measurements of cosmic-ray (CR) positron fraction by PAMELA and other experiments have found an excess above 10 GeV relative to the standard predictions for secondary production in the interstellar medium (ISM). Although the excess has been mostly suggested to arise from some primary sources of positrons (such as pulsars and or annihilating dark matter particles), the almost constant flux ratio of $e^{+}/ \bar{p}$ argues for an alternative possibility that the excess positrons and antiprotons up to the highest energies are secondary products generated in hadronic interactions. Recently, Yang \& Aharonian (2019) revisit this possibility by assuming the presence of an additional population of CR nuclei sources. Here we examine this secondary product scenario using the \texttt{DRAGON} code, where the radiative loss of positrons is taken into account consistently. We confirm that the CR proton spectrum and the antiproton data can be explained by assuming the presence of an additional population of CR sources. However, the corresponding positron spectrum deviates from the measured data significantly above 100 GeV due to the strong radiative cooling. This suggests that, although hadronic interactions can explain the antiproton data, the corresponding secondary positron flux is still not enough to account for the AMS data. Hence contribution from some primary positron sources, such as pulsars or dark matter, is non-negligible.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.