Paper detail

Examining the relationships between colour, $T_{\rm eff}$, and [M/H] for APOGEE K and M dwarfs

We present the effective temperatures ($T_{\rm eff}$), metallicities, and colours in SDSS, 2MASS, and WISE filters, of a sample of 3834 late-K and early-M dwarfs selected from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey APOGEE spectroscopic survey ASPCAP catalog. We confirm that ASPCAP $T_{\rm eff}$ values between 3550 K$<T_{\rm eff}<$4200 K are accurate to $\sim$100 K compared to interferometric $T_{\rm eff}$ values. In that same $T_{\rm eff}$ range, ASPCAP metallicities are accurate to 0.18 dex between $-1.0<$[M/H]$<0.2$. For these cool dwarfs, nearly every colour is sensitive to both $T_{\rm eff}$ and metallicity. Notably, we find that $g-r$ is not a good indicator of metallicity for near-solar metallicity early-M dwarfs. We confirm that $J-K_S$ colour is strongly dependent on metallicity, and find that $W1-W2$ colour is a promising metallicity indicator. Comparison of the late-K and early-M dwarf colours, metallicities, and $T_{\rm eff}$ to those from three different model grids shows reasonable agreement in $r-z$ and $J-K_S$ colours, but poor agreement in $u-g$, $g-r$, and $W1-W2$. Comparison of the metallicities of the KM dwarf sample to those from previous colour-metallicity relations reveals a lack of consensus in photometric metallicity indicators for late-K and early-M dwarfs. We also present empirical relations for $T_{\rm eff}$ as a function of $r-z$ colour combined with either [M/H] or $W1-W2$ colour, and for [M/H] as a function of $r-z$ and $W1-W2$ colour. These relations yield $T_{\rm eff}$ to $\sim$100 K and [M/H] to $\sim$0.18 dex precision with colours alone, for $T_{\rm eff}$ in the range of 3550-4200 K and [M/H] in the range of $-$0.5-0.2.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.