Paper detail

Examining the Effect of the Map-Making Algorithm on Observed Power Asymmetry in WMAP Data

We analyze first-year data of WMAP to determine the significance of asymmetry in summed power between arbitrarily defined opposite hemispheres, using maps that we create ourselves with software developed independently of the WMAP team. We find that over the multipole range l=[2,64], the significance of asymmetry is ~ 10^-4, a value insensitive to both frequency and power spectrum. We determine the smallest multipole ranges exhibiting significant asymmetry, and find twelve, including l=[2,3] and [6,7], for which the significance -> 0. In these ranges there is an improbable association between the direction of maximum significance and the ecliptic plane (p ~ 0.01). Also, contours of least significance follow great circles inclined relative to the ecliptic at the largest scales. The great circle for l=[2,3] passes over previously reported preferred axes and is insensitive to frequency, while the great circle for l=[6,7] is aligned with the ecliptic poles. We examine how changing map-making parameters affects asymmetry, and find that at large scales, it is rendered insignificant if the magnitude of the WMAP dipole vector is increased by approximately 1-3 sigma (or 2-6 km/s). While confirmation of this result would require data recalibration, such a systematic change would be consistent with observations of frequency-independent asymmetry. We conclude that the use of an incorrect dipole vector, in combination with a systematic or foreground process associated with the ecliptic, may help to explain the observed asymmetry.

preprint2005arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.