Paper detail

Examining the Age/Activity Relationship of Ultracool Dwarfs with GAIA

The relationship between age, rotation, and magnetic activity can be used to roughly estimate the ages of solar-type stars. At lower stellar masses, the relationship between activity and age changes due to the less efficient angular momentum loss, and may disappear entirely for ultracool (late-M and L) dwarfs. The detection of flares (as a tracer of magnetic activity) can be combined with kinematic tracers of age to explore the relationship between age and activity for ultracool dwarfs. The final data release of GAIA will provide time-resolved photometry of GAIA targets in the $G$ filter, but the effect of flares in the $G$-band is not well understood. I use a simple flare model to estimate the conversion of flare magnitudes for M3--L5 dwarfs in the Johnson $V$-, SDSS $r$-, and Kepler- bands to the GAIA $G$-band. By applying those conversions to previously observed flare rates, I estimate that M0-M6 dwarfs will have a flare rate in GAIA of $R_{f,GAIA} \gtrsim 8.73 \times 10^{-4}~{\rm hr}^{-1}~{\rm deg}^{-2}$, corresponding to a total of $\gtrsim$20,000 flares in the whole survey. If ultracool dwarfs have the same flare rate, I would expect a total of $\gtrsim$20 flares on M7-L5 dwarfs.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.