Paper detail

Exact solutions for the populations of the n-level ion

We present a matrix solution to the full equations of statistical equilibrium that give the energy level populations of collisionally-excited ions in photoionised gaseous nebulae. The rationale for such a calculation is to maintain a parity between improvements in the quantum-mechanically evaluated values for collision strengths and transition probabilities from the Iron and Opacity Projects on the one hand, and 3D photoionisation codes such as MOCASSIN and astrophysical software for producing nebular diagnostics such as the Nebular package for IRAF, on the other. We have taken advantage of the fact that mathematics programs such as MATLAB and Mathematica have proven to be very adept at symbolic manipulation providing a route to exact solutions for the n-level ion. In particular, we have avoided the substitution of estimated values. We provide the matrix solution for the 5-level ion as an example and show how the equations faithfully reduce to the exact solution for the 3-level ion. Through the forbidden line ratio R23, we compare the exact solution with a) that obtained from the observed emission of the spherical planetary nebula Abell 39, b) 3D Monte-Carlo photoionisation modelling of the same nebula, c) the approximate 5-level program TEMDEN and d) the exact 3-level ion. The general solution presented here means that programs for the calculation of level populations can obtain solutions for ions with a user-specified number of excited levels. The use of a separate and updatable database of atomic and ionic constants such as that provided by NIST, means that software of more general application can now be made available; particularly for the study of high excitation objects such as active galactic nebulae (AGNs) and supernovae (SNs) where higher excited levels become significant.

preprint2007arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.