Paper detail

Exact-Repair Minimum Bandwidth Regenerating Codes Based on Evaluation of Linearized Polynomials

In this paper, we propose two new constructions of exact-repair minimum storage regenerating (exact-MBR) codes. Both constructions obtain the encoded symbols by first treating the message vector over GF(q) as a linearized polynomial and then evaluating it over an extension field GF(q^m). The evaluation points are chosen so that the encoded symbols at any node are conjugates of each other, while corresponding symbols of different nodes are linearly dependent with respect to GF(q). These properties ensure that data repair can be carried out over the base field GF(q), instead of matrix inversion over the extension field required by some existing exact-MBR codes. To the best of our knowledge, this approach is novel in the construction of exact-MBR codes. One of our constructions leads to exact-MBR codes with arbitrary parameters. These exact-MBR codes have higher data reconstruction complexities but lower data repair complexities than their counterparts based on the product-matrix approach; hence they may be suitable for applications that need a small number of data reconstructions but a large number of data repairs.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.