Paper detail

Exact Complexity of Exact-Four-Colorability

Let $M_k \seq \nats$ be a given set that consists of $k$ noncontiguous integers. Define $\exactcolor{M_k}$ to be the problem of determining whether $χ(G)$, the chromatic number of a given graph $G$, equals one of the $k$ elements of the set $M_k$ exactly. In 1987, Wagner \cite{wag:j:min-max} proved that $\exactcolor{M_k}$ is $\bhlevel{2k}$-complete, where $M_k = \{6k+1, 6k+3, >..., 8k-1 \}$ and $\bhlevel{2k}$ is the $2k$th level of the boolean hierarchy over $\np$. In particular, for $k = 1$, it is DP-complete to determine whether $χ(G) = 7$, where $\DP = \bhlevel{2}$. Wagner raised the question of how small the numbers in a $k$-element set $M_k$ can be chosen such that $\exactcolor{M_k}$ still is $\bhlevel{2k}$-complete. In particular, for $k = 1$, he asked if it is DP-complete to determine whether $χ(G) = 4$. In this note, we solve this question of Wagner and determine the precise threshold $t \in \{4, 5, 6, 7\}$ for which the problem $\exactcolor{\{t\}}$ jumps from NP to DP-completeness: It is DP-complete to determine whether $χ(G) = 4$, yet $\exactcolor{\{3\}}$ is in $\np$. More generally, for each $k \geq 1$, we show that $\exactcolor{M_k}$ is $\bhlevel{2k}$-complete for $M_k = \{3k+1, 3k+3,..., 5k-1\}$.

preprint2001arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.