Paper detail

Evolving into a remnant: optical observations of SN 1978K at three decades

We present new optical observations of the supernova SN 1978K, obtained in 2007 and 2014 with the Very Large Telescope. We discover that the supernova has not faded significantly, even more than three decades after its explosion. The spectrum exhibits numerous narrow (FWHM $\lesssim600$ km s$^{-1}$) emission lines, indicating that the supernova blastwave is persistently interacting with dense circumstellar material (CSM). Evolution of emission lines indicates that the supernova ejecta is slowly progressing through the reverse shock, and has not expanded past the outer edge of the circumstellar envelope. We demonstrate that the CSM is not likely to be spherically distributed, with mass of $\lesssim$ 1 M$_\odot$. The progenitor mass loss rate is estimated as $\gtrsim 0.01$ M$_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$. The slowly fading late-time light curve and spectra show striking similarity with SN 1987A, indicating that a rate at which the CSM is being swept-up by the blastwave is gradually decaying and SN 1978K is undergoing similar evolution to become a remnant. Due to its proximity (4 Mpc), SN 1978K serves as the next best example of late-time supernova evolution after SN 1987A.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.