Paper detail

Evolutionary link between globular clusters and circumgalactic clouds

The established by us possibility to consider circumgalactic clouds (CGCs) as the remnants of the parent clouds in which globular clusters (GCs) have been formed (Acharova & Sharina 2018) is based on a comparison of the following facts. First, the metallicities of CGCs at redshifts $ z <1 $ and of GCs in our and other galaxies show a bimodal distribution with a minimum near $\rm [Mg/H]=-1$. Mean values and standard deviations of the Mg abundances in GCs and CGCs with $\rm [Mg/H]<-1$ and $\rm [Mg/H]> -1$ coincide within the typical error of measuring the elemental abundances in clouds: 0.3 dex (Acharova & Sharina 2018). Second, a similar coincidence is observed for GCs and CGCs with $\rm [X/H]<-1$ and $\rm [X/H]> -1$ at redshifts $ 2 <z <3 $, where $[X/H]$ is the metallicity determined from the sum of several elemental abundances (Dias et al. 2016, Rafelski et al. 2012, Wotta et al. 2019, Quiret et al. 2016). Third, high-metallicity CGCs are observed starting from redshifts $\rm z\le 2.5$, i.e. approximately 11 Gyrs ago. At the same time globular clusters were actively formed, and their supernovae were able to enrich the surrounding gas, from which the high-metal component of the clouds was formed.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.