Paper detail

Evolutionary interplay between structure, energy and epistasis in the coat protein of the $ϕχ174$ phage family

Viral capsids are structurally constrained by interactions amongst the amino acids of the constituting proteins. Therefore, epistasis is expected to evolve amongst sites engaged in physical interactions, and to influence their substitution rates. In order to study the distribution of structural epistasis, we modeled \emph{in silico} the capsid of 18 species of the \phix \, family, including the wild type. \phix \, is amongst the simplest organisms, making it suitable for experimental evolution and \emph{in silico} modeling. We found nearly 40 variable amino acid sites in the main capsid protein across the 18 species. To study how epistasis evolved in this group, we reconstructed the ancestral sequences using a Bayesian phylogenetic framework. The ancestral states include 8 variable amino acids, for a total of 256 possible haplotypes. The $dN/dS$ ratio is low, suggesting strong purifying selection, consistent with the idea that the structure is constrained by some form of stabilizing selection. For each haplotype in the ancestral node and for the extant species we estimated \emph{in silico} the distribution of free energies and of epistasis. We found that free energy has not significantly increased but epistasis has. We decomposed epistasis up to fifth order and found that high-order epistasis can sometimes compensate pairwise interactions, often making the free energy seem additive. By synthesizing some of the ancestral haplotypes of the capsid gene, we measured their fitness experimentally, and found that the predicted deviations in the coat protein free energy do not significantly affect fitness, which is consistent with the stabilizing selection hypothesis.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.