Paper detail

Evolutionary Games on Isothermal Graphs

Population structure affects the outcome of natural selection. Static population structures can be described by graphs, where individuals occupy the nodes, and interactions occur along the edges. General conditions for evolutionary success on any weighted graph were recently derived, for weak selection, in terms of coalescence times of random walks. Here we show that for a special class of graphs, the conditions for success take a particularly simple form, in which all effects of graph structure are described by the graph's "effective degree"---a measure of the effective number of neighbors per individual. This result holds for all weighted graphs that are isothermal, meaning that the sum of edge weights is the same at each node. Isothermal graphs encompass a wide variety of underlying topologies, and arise naturally from supposing that each individual devotes the same amount of time to interaction. Cooperative behavior is favored on a large isothermal graph if the benefit-to-cost ratio exceeds the effective degree. We relate the effective degree of a graph to its spectral gap, thereby providing a link between evolutionary dynamics and the theory of expander graphs. As a surprising example, we report graphs of infinite average degree that are nonetheless highly conducive for promoting cooperation.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.