Paper detail

Evolution Strategies for Cosmology: A Comparison of Nested Sampling Methods

Here we present an investigation into using nested sampling algorithms in cosmological likelihood analysis. We present a new nested sampling algorithm, ESNested, that uses Evolution Strategies for sample proposals. This quickly finds the maximum for complex likelihoods and provides an accurate measure of the Bayesian evidence, with no prior assumptions about the shape of the likelihood surface. We present the first cosmological constraints using Evolution Strategies, from WMAP 7, HST and SNIa data using likelihood and data provided with CosmoMC. We find a significantly higher maximum likelihood than that found with other methods. We compare the performance of ESNested with the publicly available MultiNest and CosmoNest algorithms, in i) finding the maximum likelihood ii) calculating confidence contours in projected parameter spaces and iii) calculating the Bayesian evidence. We find that none of the algorithms provide a single solution for all of these products in general. Our recommendation is that multiple sampling methods should be used in cosmological likelihood analysis and that algorithms should be tailored to perform optimally for each of these requirements. These results have a resonance with the well-known No Free Lunch theorem.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.