Paper detail

Evolution of the Population of Very Strong MgII Absorbers

We present a study of the evolution of several classes of MgII absorbers, and their corresponding FeII absorption, over a large fraction of cosmic history: 2.3 to 8.7 Gyrs from the Big Bang. Our sample consists of 87 strong (Wr(MgII)>0.3 A) MgII absorbers, with redshifts 0.2<z<2.5, measured in 81 quasar spectra obtained from the Very Large Telescope(VLT)/Ultraviolet and Visual Echelle Spectrograph(UVES) archives of high-resolution spectra (R \sim 45,000). No evolutionary trend in Wr(FeII)/Wr(MgII) is found for moderately strong MgII absorbers (0.3<Wr(MgII)<1.0 A). However, at lower z we find an absence of very strong MgII absorbers (those with Wr(MgII)>1 A) with small ratios of equivalent widths of FeII to MgII. At high z, very strong MgII absorbers with both small and large Wr(FeII)/Wr(MgII) values are present. We compare our findings to a sample of 100 weak MgII absorbers (Wr(MgII)<0.3 A) found in the same quasar spectra by Narayanan et al. (2007). The main effect driving the evolution of very strong MgII systems is the difference between the kinematic profiles at low and high redshifts. At high z, we observe that, among the very strong MgII absorbers, all of the systems with small ratios of Wr(FeII)/Wr(MgII) have relatively large velocity spreads, resulting in less saturated profiles. At low z, such kinematically spread systems are absent, and both FeII and MgII are saturated, leading to Wr(FeII)/Wr(MgII) values that are all close to 1. The high redshift, small Wr(FeII)/Wr(MgII) systems could correspond to sub-DLA systems, many of which have large velocity spreads and are possibly linked to superwinds in star forming galaxies. In addition to the change in saturation due to kinematic evolution, the smaller Wr(FeII)/Wr(MgII) values could be due to a lower abundance of Fe at high z, which would indicate relatively early stages of star formation in those environments.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.