Paper detail

Evolution of the Most Massive Galaxies to z=0.6: I. A New Method for Physical Parameter Estimation

We use principal component analysis (PCA) to estimate stellar masses, mean stellar ages, star formation histories (SFHs), dust extinctions and stellar velocity dispersions for ~290,000 galaxies with stellar masses greater than $10^{11}Msun and redshifts in the range 0.4<z<0.7 from the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS). We find the fraction of galaxies with active star formation first declines with increasing stellar mass, but then flattens above a stellar mass of 10^{11.5}Msun at z~0.6. This is in striking contrast to z~0.1, where the fraction of galaxies with active star formation declines monotonically with stellar mass. At stellar masses of 10^{12}Msun, therefore, the evolution in the fraction of star-forming galaxies from z~0.6 to the present-day reaches a factor of ~10. When we stack the spectra of the most massive, star-forming galaxies at z~0.6, we find that half of their [OIII] emission is produced by AGNs. The black holes in these galaxies are accreting on average at ~0.01 the Eddington rate. To obtain these results, we use the stellar population synthesis models of Bruzual & Charlot (2003) to generate a library of model spectra with a broad range of SFHs, metallicities, dust extinctions and stellar velocity dispersions. The PCA is run on this library to identify its principal components over the rest-frame wavelength range 3700-5500A. We demonstrate that linear combinations of these components can recover information equivalent to traditional spectral indices such as the 4000A break strength and HdA, with greatly improved S/N. This method is able to recover physical parameters such as stellar mass-to-light ratio, mean stellar age, velocity dispersion and dust extinction from the relatively low S/N BOSS spectra. We examine the sensitivity of our stellar mass estimates to the input parameters in our model library and the different stellar population synthesis models.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access13 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.