Paper detail

Evolution of the Hubble Sequence in Hierarchical Models for Galaxy Formation

We present a model for the broad morphological distinction between the disk and spheroidal components of galaxies. Elaborating on the hierarchical clustering scheme of galaxy formation proposed by Cole et al., we assume that galaxies form stars quiescently in a disk until they are disrupted into a spheroidal configuration by mergers. We calculate formation and merging histories, and the evolution in colour, luminosity and morphology of the galaxy populations in different environments. Roughly $ 50\ %$ of ellipticals in our model have undergone a major merger since $z = 0.5$, yet in spite of this we find that cluster ellipticals have colour-magnitude diagrams with remarkably small scatter. The morphological mix of galaxies that become rich cluster members at high redshift is dominated by spiral galaxies, due to the long timescale for galaxy mergers compared with the timescale for cluster assembly at high redshift. The assembly of low redshift clusters is slower, allowing more galaxy mergers to occur in the progenitor halos. As a result $z=0$ rich clusters become E/S0 dominated and we find a ``Butcher-Oemler'' effect that becomes weaker for poorer groups at high redshift. The field luminosity function of red galaxies shows little evolution out to $z\simeq 1$ and the reddest galaxies at these redshifts are as bright as their local counterparts. The blue luminosity function, on the other hand, evolves rapidly with redshift, increasing its characteristic luminosity and becoming steeper at the faint end. These trends are similar to those recently observed in the Canada-France Redshift Survey.

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.