Paper detail

Evolution of the grain size distribution in galactic discs

Dust is formed out of stellar material and is constantly affected by different mechanisms occurring in the ISM. Dust grains behave differently under these mechanisms depending on their sizes, and therefore the dust grain size distribution also evolves as part of the dust evolution itself. Following how the grain size distribution evolves is a difficult computing task that is just recently being overtaking. Smoothed particle hydrodynamic (SPH) simulations of a single galaxy as well as cosmological simulations are producing the first predictions of the evolution of the dust grain size distribution. We compare for the first time the evolution of the dust grain size distribution predicted by the SPH simulations with the results provided by the observations. We analyse how the radial distribution of the small to large grain mass ratio (D(S)/D(L)) changes over the whole discs in three galaxies: M 101, NGC 628 and M 33. We find good agreement between the observed radial distribution of D(S)/D(L) and what is obtained from the SPH simulations of a single galaxy. The central parts of NGC 628, at high metallicity and with a high molecular gas fraction, are mainly affected not only by accretion but also by coagulation of dust grains. The centre of M 33, having lower metallicity and lower molecular gas fraction, presents an increase of D(S)/D(L), showing that shattering is very effective in creating a large fraction of small grains. Observational results provided by our galaxies confirm the general relations predicted by the cosmological simulations based on the two grain size approximation. However, we present evidence that the simulations could be overestimating the amount of large grains in high massive galaxies.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.