Paper detail

Evolution of the dusty infrared luminosity function from z=0 to z=2.3 using observations from Spitzer

We derive the evolution of the infrared (IR) luminosity function (LF) over the last 4/5ths of cosmic time, using deep 24um and 70um imaging of the GOODS North and South fields. We use an extraction technique based on prior source positions at shorter wavelengths to build the 24 and 70um source catalogs. The majority (93%) of the sources have a spectroscopic (39%) or a photometric redshift (54%) and, in our redshift range of interest (i.e., 1.3<z<2.3) ~20% of the sources have a spectroscopic redshifts. To extend our study to lower 70um luminosities we perform a stacking analysis and we characterize the observed L_24/(1+z) vs L_70/(1+z) correlation. Using spectral energy distribution templates which best fit this correlation, we derive the IR luminosity of sources from their 24 and 70 um fluxes. We then compute the IR LF at z=1.55+/-0.25 and z=2.05+/-0.25. The redshift evolution of the IR LF from z=1.3 to z=2.3 is consistent with a luminosity evolution proportional to (1+z)^1.0+/-0.9 combined with a density evolution proportional to (1+z)^-1.1+/-1.5. At z~2, luminous IR galaxies (LIRGs: 10^11Lsun< LIR <10^12Lsun) are still the main contributors to the total comoving IR luminosity density (IR LD) of the Universe. At z~2, LIRGs and ultra-luminous IR galaxies (ULIRGs: 10^12Lsun< LIR) account for ~49% and ~17% respectively of the total IR LD of the Universe. Combined with previous results for galaxies at z<1.3 and assuming a constant conversion between the IR luminosity and star-formation rate (SFR) of a galaxy, we study the evolution of the SFR density of the Universe from z=0 to z=2.3. We find that the SFR density of the Universe strongly increased with redshift from z=0 to z=1.3, but is nearly constant at higher redshift out to z=2.3. As part of the online material accompanying this article, we present source catalogs at 24um and 70um for both the GOODS-North and -South fields.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.