Paper detail

Evolution of the Colour--Radius Relation and the Morphology--Radius Relation in the SDSS Galaxy Clusters

We have investigated the redshift evolution of the colour--cluster-centric-radius relation and the morphology--cluster-centric-radius relation in three redshift bins, $0.02\leq z\leq 0.14$, $0.14< z\leq 0.20$, and $0.20< z\leq 0.30$ using a homogeneous sample of 736 galaxy clusters selected from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Both the relations are well-defined in all the redshift bins; the fraction of blue/late-type galaxies increases toward outside of clusters.Blue/late-type galaxy fractions are found to decrease with decreasing redshift at any cluster-centric radius. The trend is consistent with the Butcher-Oemler effect and the morphological Butcher-Oemlereffect. In addition, we find that colour (spectral) evolution is almost completed by $z\sim0.2$, whereas morphological evolution continues to the present day. The colour-radius relation is smooth inall the redshift bins, while the morphology--radius relation has a break only in the highest redshift bin. It is also found thatfractions of blue-late type galaxies decreases mostly between the highest and the intermediate redshift bins, while fractions of red-late type galaxies continuously decreases with decreasing redshift through all the redshift bins. These results are consistent with the interpretation that the timescale of the colour (spectral) evolution is shorter than that of the morphological evolution. It is suggested that red-late type galaxies in the middle of the transformation are observed as passive spiral galaxies.

preprint2003arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.