Paper detail

Evolution of progenitors for electron capture supernovae

We provide progenitor models for electron capture supernovae (ECSNe) with detailed evolutionary calculation. We include minor electron capture nuclei using a large nuclear reaction network with updated reaction rates. For electron captures, the Coulomb correction on the rates is treated and contribution of neutron-rich nuclei is taken into account in the nuclear statistical equilibrium (NSE) composition. We calculate the evolution of the most massive super asymptotic giant branch stars and show that these stars undergo off-center carbon burnings and form ONe cores at the center. These cores get heavier up to the critical mass of 1.367 Msun and keep contracting even after the initiation of O+Ne deflagration. Though inclusion of minor electron capture nuclei causes convective URCA process at the contraction phase, such process will have minor effect on the evolution. On the other hand, electron captures by neutron-rich nuclei in the NSE region have more significant effect. Also, we discuss the uniqueness of the critical core mass for ECSNe and the effect of mass loss on the plausibility of our models for ECSN progenitors.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.