Paper detail

Evolution of Planetary Systems with Time Dependent Stellar Mass Loss

Observations indicate that intermediate mass stars, binary stars, and stellar remnants often host planets; a complete explanation of these systems requires an understanding of how planetary orbits evolve as their central stars lose mass. Motivated by these dynamical systems, this paper generalizes in two directions previous studies of orbital evolution in planetary systems with stellar mass loss: [1] Many previous treatments focus on constant mass loss rates and much of this work is carried out numerically. Here we study a class of single planet systems where the stellar mass loss rate is time dependent. The mass loss rate can be increasing or decreasing, but the stellar mass always decreases monotonically. For this class of models, we develop analytic approximations to specify the final orbital elements for planets that remain bound after the epoch of mass loss, and find the conditions required for the planets to become unbound. We also show that for some mass loss functions, planets become unbound only in the asymptotic limit where the stellar mass vanishes. [2] We consider the chaotic evolution for two planet systems with stellar mass loss. Here we focus on a model consisting of analogs of Jupiter, Saturn, and the Sun. By monitoring the divergence of initially similar trajectories through time, we calculate the Lyapunov exponents of the system. This analog solar system is chaotic in the absence of mass loss with Lyapunov time in the range 5 - 10 Myr; we find that the Lyapunov time decreases with increasing stellar mass loss rate, with a nearly linear relationship between the two time scales. Taken together, the results of this paper help provide an explanation for a wide range of dynamical evolution that occurs in solar systems with stellar mass loss.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.