Paper detail

Evolution of oxygen and nitrogen abundances and nitrogen production mechanism in massive star-forming galaxies

Utilizing the observational data of 55,318 star-forming galaxies (SFGs) selected from the catalog of MPA-JHU emission-line measurements for the SDSS DR8, we investigate the galaxy downsizing effect of their O and N enrichments, and the nitrogen production mechanism in them. We show the redshift evolution of O and N abundances and specific star formation rates for different galaxy mass ranges, demonstrating the galaxy downsizing effect caused by less massive progenitors of less massive galaxies. The O and N abundances do not remain constant for different galaxy mass ranges, and the enrichment (and hence star formation) decreases with increasing galaxy stellar mass. We find evidence of the O enrichment for galaxies with stellar masses $M_{*}>10^{11.0} $ (in units of $M_{\odot}$), i.e. $Δ({\log}({\rm O/H})) \sim 0.10$ and $Δ({\log}({\rm N/H})) \sim 0.28$ from redshift 0.023 to 0.30. Based on the evolutionary schematic model of N/O ratios in Coziol et al., who proposed the scheme that the production of nitrogen is the consequence of a sequence of bursts in SFGs, we conclude that the nitrogen production is dominated by the intermediate-mass stars, which dominate the secondary synthesis in SFGs. However, for galaxies with $M_{*}>10^{10.35} $ we find evidence of enhanced N/O abundance ratios, which are significantly above the secondary synthesis line. This suggests that outflows of massive stars, which deplete oxygen efficiently, are more important in massive galaxies. Finally we find an excellent linear relation between $M_{*}$ and log(N/O), indicating that the N/O abundance ratio is a good indicator of the stellar mass in a SFG and may be used as a standard candle for studying cosmology, if confirmed with further studies.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.