Paper detail

Evolution of multiple supernova remnants

(Abridged) Heating of the interstellar medium by multiple supernovae (SNe) explosions is at the heart of producing galaxy-scale outflows. We use hydrodynamical simulations to study the efficiency of multiple SNe in heating the interstellar medium (ISM) and filling the volume with gas of high temperatures. We argue that it is important for SNe remnants to have a large filling factor {\it and} a large heating efficiency. For this, they have to be clustered in space and time, and keep exploding until the hot gas percolates through the whole region, in order to compensate for the radiative loss. In the case of a limited number of SNe, we find that although the filling factor can be large, the heating efficiency declines after reaching a large value. In the case of a continuous series of SNe, the hot gas ($T \ge 3 \times 10^6$ K) can percolate through the whole region after the total volume filling factor reaches a threshold of $\sim 0.3$. The efficiency of heating the gas to X-ray temperatures can be $\ge 0.1$ after this percolation epoch, which occurs after a period of $\approx 10$ Myr for a typical starburst SNe rate density of $ν_{\rm SN} \approx 10^{-9}$ pc$^{-3}$ yr$^{-1}$ and gas density of $n\approx 10$ cm$^{-3}$ in starburst nuclei regions. This matches the recent observations of a time delay of similar order between the onset of star formation and galactic outflows. The efficiency to heat gas up to X-ray temperatures ($\ge 10^{6.5}$ K) roughly scales as $ν_{\rm SN}^{0.2} n^{-0.6}$. For a typical SNe rate density and gas density in starburst nuclei, the heating efficiency is $\sim 0.15$, also consistent with previous interpretations from X-ray observations. We discuss the implications of our results with regard to observational diagnostics of ionic ratios and emission measures in starburst nuclei regions.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.