Paper detail

Evolution of Massive Galaxy Structural Properties and Sizes via Star Formation

We investigate the resolved star formation properties of a sample of 45 massive galaxies (M_*>10^11M_solar) within a redshift range of 1.5 < z < 3 detected in the GOODS NICMOS Survey (Conselice et al. 2011), a HST H-band imaging program. We derive the star formation rate as a function of radius using rest frame UV data from deep z_{850} ACS imaging. The star formation present at high redshift is then extrapolated to z=0, and we examine the stellar mass produced in individual regions within each galaxy. We also construct new stellar mass profiles of the in-situ stellar mass at high redshift from Sersic fits to rest-frame optical, H_{160}-band, data. We combine the two stellar mass profiles to produce a modelled evolved stellar mass profile. We then fit a new Sersic profile to the evolved profile, from which we examine what effect the resulting stellar mass distribution added via star formation has on the structure and size of each individual galaxy. We conclude that due to the lack of sufficient size growth and Sersic evolution by star formation other mechanisms such as merging must contribute a large proportion to account for the observed structural evolution from z>1 to the present day.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.