Paper detail

Evolution of Group Galaxies from the First Red-Sequence Cluster Survey

We study the evolution of the red galaxy fraction (f_red) in 905 galaxy groups with 0.15 < z < 0.52. The galaxy groups are identified by the `probability Friends-of-Friends&#39; algorithm from the first Red-Sequence Cluster Survey (RCS1) photometric-redshift sample. There is a high degree of uniformity in the properties of the red-sequence of the group galaxies, indicating that the luminous red-sequence galaxies in the groups are already in place by z~0.5 and that they have a formation epoch of z>2. In general, groups at lower redshifts exhibit larger f_red than those at higher redshifts, showing a group Butcher-Oemler effect. We investigate the evolution of f_red by examining its dependence on four parameters, which can be classified as one intrinsic and three environmental: galaxy stellar mass (M_*), total group stellar mass(M_{*,grp}, a proxy for group halo mass), normalized group-centric radius (r_grp), and local galaxy density (Sigma_5). We find that M_* is the dominant parameter such that there is a strong correlation between f_red and galaxy stellar mass. Furthermore, the dependence of f_red on the environmental parameters is also a strong function of M_*. Massive galaxies (M_* > 10^11 M_sun) show little dependence of f_red on r_grp, M_{*,grp}, and Sigma_5 over the redshift range. The dependence of f_red on these parameters is primarily seen for galaxies with lower masses, especially for M_* < 10^{10.6} M_{sun}. We observe an apparent `group down-sizing&#39; effect, in that galaxies in lower-mass halos, after controlling for galaxy stellar mass, have lower f_red. We find a dependence of \fred on both \rgrp and \SigmaF after the other parameters are controlled. At a fixed \rgrp, there is a significant dependence of f_red on Sigma_5, while r_grp gradients of f_red are seen for galaxies in similar Sigma_5 regions. This indicates .....

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.