Paper detail

Evolution of dust in the Orion Bar with Herschel: I. Radiative transfer modelling

Interstellar dust is a key element in our understanding of the interstellar medium and star formation. The manner in which dust populations evolve with the excitation and the physical conditions is a first step in the comprehension of the evolution of inter- stellar dust. Within the framework of the Evolution of interstellar dust Herschel key program, we have acquired PACS and SPIRE spec- trophotometric observations of various photodissociation regions, to characterise this evolution. The aim of this paper is to trace the evolution of dust grains in the Orion Bar photodissociation region. We use Herschel/PACS (70 and 160 mic) and SPIRE (250, 350 and 500 mic) together with Spitzer/IRAC observations to map the spatial distribution of the dust populations across the Bar. Brightness profiles are modelled using the DustEM model coupled with a radiative transfer code. Thanks to Herschel, we are able to probe finely the dust emission of the densest parts of the Orion Bar with a resolution from 5.6" to 35.1". These new observations allow us to infer the temperature of the biggest grains at different positions in the Bar, which reveals a gradient from \sim 80 K to 40 K coupled with an increase of the spectral emissivity index from the ionization front to the densest regions. Combining Spitzer/IRAC observations, which are sensitive to the dust emission from the surface, with Herschel maps, we have been able to measure the Orion Bar emission from 3.6 to 500 mic. We find a stratification in the different dust components which can be re- produced quantitatively by a simple radiative transfer model without dust evolution. However including dust evolution is needed to explain the brightness in each band. PAH abundance variations, or a combination of PAH abundance variations with an emissivity enhancement of the biggest grains due to coagulation give good results.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.