Paper detail

Evolution of Compact Groups of Galaxies I. Merging Rates

We discuss the merging rates in compact groups of 5 identical elliptical galaxies. All groups have the same mass and binding energy. We consider both cases with individual halos and cases where the halo is common to all galaxies and enveloping the whole group. In the latter situation the merging rate is slower if the halo is more massive. The mass of individual halos has little influence on the merging rates, due to the fact that all galaxies in our simulations have the same mass, and so the more extended ones have a smaller velocity dispersion. Groups with individual halos merge faster than groups with common halos if the configuration is centrally concentrated, like a King distribution of index 10. On the other hand for less concentrated configurations the merging is initially faster for individual halo cases, and slower after part of the group has merged. In cases with common halo, centrally concentrated configurations merge faster for high halo-to-total mass ratios and slower for low halo-to-total mass ratios. Groups whose virial ratio is initially less than one merge faster, while groups that have initially cylindrical rotation merge slower than groups starting in virial equilibrium. In order to test how long a virialised group can survive before merging we followed the evolution of a group with a high halo-to-total mass ratio and a density distribution with very little central concentration. We find that the first merging occurred only after a large number of crossing times, which with areasonable calibration should be larger than a Hubble time. Hence, at least for appropriate initial conditions, the longevity of compact groups is not necessarily a problem, which is an alternative explanation to why we observe so many compact groups despite the fact that their lifetimes seem short.

preprint1996arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.