Paper detail

Evolution of Clusters of Galaxies II: Dependence on Initial Cluster Model

We investigated the evolution of clusters of galaxies using self-consistent N-body simulations. We varied the initial model of galaxies and clusters, and studied the dependence of evolution on initial conditions. We found that the growth rate of the common halo depends only weakly on galaxy models. On the other hand, the growth rate depends strongly on cluster models. Initially the growth rate is higher for cluster models with higher central density. However, this high growth rate drops in a few crossing times of the cluster, and after several crossing times, roughly half of the total mass is in the common halo in all models we considered. In the central region of clusters density cusps with the profile ρ~ r^{-1.2} develops regardless of the models of clusters and galaxies. We also found that the galaxies evolved so as to satisfy the relation between the masses of galaxies m_{gx} and their velocity dispersion σ_{gx} expressed as m_{gx} \propto σ_{gx}^{3~4} for all galaxy models as a consequence of their dynamical evolution through galaxy-galaxy interactions. We discuss the relation between our result and the observed Faber-Jackson relation.

preprint2000arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.