Paper detail

Evolution of CIV Absorbers. II. Where does CIV live?

We use the observed cumulative statistics of CIV absorbers and dark matter halos to infer the distribution of CIV-absorbing gas relative to galaxies at redshifts $0\!\leq\!z\!\leq\!5$. We compare the cosmic incidence $dN/dX$ of CIV absorber populations and galaxy halos, finding that massive $L \geq L_{\star}$ halos alone cannot account for all the observed $W_r \geq 0.05$~Å absorbers. However, the $dN/dX$ of lower mass halos exceeds that of $W_r \geq 0.05$~Å absorbers. We also estimate the characteristic gas radius of absorbing structures required for the observed CIV $dN/dX$, assuming each absorber is associated with a single galaxy halo. The $W_r \geq 0.3$~Å and $W_r \geq 0.6$~Å CIV gas radii are $\sim30-70\%$ ($\sim20-40\%$) of the virial radius of $L_{\star}$ ($0.1L_{\star}$) galaxies, and the $W_r \geq 0.05$~Å gas radius is $\sim100-150\%$($\sim60-100\%$) of the virial radius of $L_{\star}$ ($0.1L_{\star}$) galaxies. For stronger absorbers, the gas radius relative to virial radius rises across Cosmic Noon and falls afterwards, while for weaker absorbers, the relative gas radius declines across Cosmic Noon and then dramatically rises at $z\!<\!1$. A strong luminosity-dependence of gas radius implies highly extended CIV envelopes around massive galaxies before Cosmic Noon, while a luminosity-independent gas radius implies highly extended envelopes around dwarf galaxies after Cosmic Noon. From available absorber-galaxy and CIV evolution data, we favor a scenario in which low-mass galaxies enrich the volume around massive galaxies at early epochs and propose that the outer halo gas ($>0.5R_v$) was produced primarily in ancient satellite dwarf galaxy outflows, while the inner halo gas ($<0.5R_v$) originated from the central galaxy and persists as recycled accreting gas.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.