Paper detail

Evolution of binary seeds in collapsing protostellar gas clouds

We perform three dimensional smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) simulations of gas accretion onto the seeds of binary stars to investigate their short-term evolution. Our simulation setup is more realistic compared to the previous works by taking into account of dynamically evolving envelope with non-uniform distribution of gas density and angular momentum of accreting flow. Our initial condition includes a seed binary and a surrounding gas envelope, modelling the phase of core collapse of gas cloud when the fragmentation has already occurred. We assume that the seed binary has no eccentricity and no growth by gas accretion. The envelope is assumed to be an isothermal gas with no self-gravity. We run multiple simulations with different values of initial mass ratio $q_0$ (the ratio of secondary over primary mass) and gas temperature, and find a critical value of $q_{\rm c} = 0.25$ which distinguishes the later evolution of mass ratio $q$ as a function of time. If $q_0$ >~ $q_{\rm c}$, the secondary seed grows faster and $q$ increases monotonically towards unity. If $q_0$ <~ $q_{\rm c}$, on the other hand, the primary seed grows faster and $q$ is lower than $q_0$ at the end of the simulation. Based on our numerical results, we analytically calculate the long-term evolution of the seed binary including the growth of binary by gas accretion. We find that the seed binary with $q_0$ >~ $q_{\rm c}$ evolves towards an equal-mass binary star, and that with $q_0$ <~ $q_{\rm c}$ evolves to a binary with an extreme value of $q$. Binary separation is a monotonically increasing function of time for any $q_0$, suggesting that the binary growth by accretion does not lead to the formation of close binaries.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.