Paper detail

Evolution in the Clustering of Galaxies to r = 26 (TAPIR GRP-390)

We present results for the two-point angular correlation function of galaxies to a limiting magnitude of r=26. The final sample is 97% complete to r=26.0, yielding 5730 galaxies over a 90.1 sq. arcmin field. The correlation function for our faint galaxies can be parameterised by a power law, $A θ^{-0.8}$, in agreement with the clustering statistics of shallower catalogues. The derived amplitude, $A$, is small, but non-zero. We combine this measurement with the latest statistical constraints on faint galaxy redshifts from gravitational lensing studies, which imply that the bulk of the r<26 field galaxies should be at redshifts of order 1. Our derived $A$ is significantly lower than that predicted from the local bright galaxy correlation function using the lensing-determined galaxy redshift distribution and modest growth of clustering. This simplistic model does not include the variation in observed morphological mix as a function of redshift and apparent magnitude in our sample. At our faintest limits we reach sufficiently high redshifts that differential $K$ corrections will result in the observed galaxy mix being dominated by star bursting dwarf and low surface brightness irregulars, rather than the early-type systems used to define the local bright galaxy correlation function. Adopting the correlation function measured locally for these low surface brightness galaxies and assuming modest clustering evolution, we obtain reasonable agreement between our model and observations. This model supports the scenario in which the high number density of faint galaxies is produced by normally clustered star forming dwarf galaxies at modest redshifts.

preprint1994arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.