Paper detail

Evolution and Consequences of Coronal Mass Ejections in the Heliosphere

Investigating the heliospheric evolution and consequences of Coronal mass ejections (CMEs) is critical to understanding the solar-terrestrial relationship. For the first time, Heliospheric Imagers (HIs) onboard STEREO, providing multiple views of CMEs in the heliosphere, observed the vast and crucial observational gap between the Sun and the Earth. Using J-maps constructed from coronagraphs (CORs) and HIs observations, we continuously tracked different density enhanced features of CMEs. We implemented several reconstruction methods to estimate the three-dimensional (3D) kinematics of CMEs during their evolution from the Sun to Earth. Our study provides evidence that the 3D speeds of CMEs near the Sun are not reasonably sufficient for understanding the propagation and accurate forecasting of the arrival time at the Earth of a majority of CMEs. This finding can be due to many factors that significantly change the CME kinematics beyond the COR field of view, such as the interaction/collision of two or more CMEs or the interaction of CMEs with the ambient solar wind medium. We attempted to understand the evolution and consequences of the interacting/colliding CMEs in the heliosphere using STEREO/HI, WIND, and ACE observations. The study found a significant change in the dynamics of the CMEs after their collision and interaction. The in situ observations show the signatures of CME-CME interaction as heating and compression, formation of magnetic holes (MHs), and interaction region (IR). We also noticed that long-lasting IR, formed at the rear edge of preceding CME, is responsible for large geomagnetic perturbations. Our study highlights the significance of using HIs observations in studying heliospheric evolution of CMEs, CME-CME collision, identifying and associating the three-part structure of CMEs in their remote and in situ observations, and hence for improved space weather forecasting.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.